Board unanimous in opposition to alcohol permit

June 28, 2008

Months-long process culminates in neighborhood association’s decisive vote

 

By Jonathan Edwards

 

The Faubourg-St. John Neighborhood Association’s board unanimously voted to oppose letting a would-be convenience store sell alcohol in the neighborhood when they met Saturday morning.

 

The decisive vote comes in the wake of survey results released Wednesday showing overwhelming resident opposition to a zoning change that would allow Brother’s Food Mart, a convenience store chain with multiple locations in Greater New Orleans, to sell alcohol at the now-derelict building sitting between DeBlanc Pharmacy and the Asian Pacific Cafe.

 

Nearly 68 percent residents surveyed—or 158 of 233—objected to alcohol sales at Brother’s, according to the survey results.

 

“Right now our alcohol providers are responsible and good merchants. There is no selling to minors, no selling to those who have consumed too much and no aggressive selling of objectionable packages of alcohol,” Linda Landesberg wrote in a June 9 e-mail she posted on the Faubourg-St. John Neighborhood Association listserv.

 

“We have reached our limit,” wrote Landesberg, “and we don’t need to stress out the businesses we have and love with more competition from a chain store.”

 

Eddie Hamden, the owner of Brother’s Food Mart, has tried to work with residents, but he also needs to run a profitable business, said Joe DiRosa, Hamden’s attorney. Brother’s can sell alcohol if we get a permit, or we can install gas pumps and stay open 24 hours.

 

BOOZE OR GAS?

 

Brother’s must apply for a permit through city government and ultimately get approval from the City Council in order to sell alcohol at their Esplanade location. Support, or at least non-opposition from residents and the neighborhood association could help Hamden’s application.

 

Since Hamden’s property is zoned as a “neighborhood business,” he has the legal right to install gas pumps and set his hours without any permits from city government. But, DiRosa said, we wanted to be a good neighbor, so we have tried to listen to residents and address their concerns.

 

“The basic issue is whether or not the neighborhood would rather have a store with limited hours (6AM to 11PM) that sells the same types of liquor that is sold at Terranovas and Consecos without 6 gas pumps, or a (likely)24 hour convenience store with no liquor, but with 6 gas pumps in the parking lot near Esplanade Avenue,” explained Rocky Seydel, a lawyer and a FSJNA board member in a June 7 listserv e-mail.

 

Residents have expressed concern over both options. Some worry alcohol sales will result in loitering and increased crime. Cheap gasoline, others fear, will cause traffic congestion.

 

“Does anyone remember when Circle K had gas pumps,” asked Kenny Tassin in a June 9 FSJNA post. “I do and it was a traffic nightmare. Esplanade and Grand Route St John was always congested with cars waiting in line for the gas pumps that the parking lot is to small for.”

 

As national prices gas prices rose above $4 a gallon, others thought affordable gasoline would be an asset to the neighborhood.

 

“Competitive gas at convenient hours is not the end of the world. Heck, even a little fried food that i could buy at 11:00 pm would be quite nice. We have all the beer, wine, and liquor we need in the area. We lack competitive gas and late night convenience services,” wrote Bill Dalton on June 8.

 

THE 13 PROVISOS

 

Trying to address resident concerns, Brother’s and FSJNA negotiated a deal in February that was subject to resident opinion (hence the survey): the neighborhood association would not oppose Hamden’s application to sell alcohol if he agreed to follow 13 “provisos,” which dictated how Brother’s would operate once it opened.

 

The provisos would limit the store’s hours of operation and the types of alcoholic beverages it could sell to those already sold by other businesses in the area. It also forbids the installation of gas pumps.

 

Derek Scheerer, a city planner with the New Orleans City Planning Commission and a Faubourg-St. John resident, looked over the provisos at City Hall and called them “a wish list.”

 

“They can ask that these be put in, but Brother’s doesn’t have to listen to them one iota,” said Scheerer. “The neighborhood association has absolutely zero say. Only the City Council can attach provisos.”

 

Scheerer focused on proviso 12: “Brothers will agree to sell only the type and quality of liquor, beer and wine sold at Conseco’s and Terranova’s; including no quarts of beer and no malt liquor.”

 

“This is absolutely arbitrary,” he said. “I think it borders on racist. I take offense to that. It’s his business. He can see what he wants to sell. It’s very elitist.”

 

The City Council will not attach such a proviso, Scheerer said. They will limit the hours of operation and make sure lighting is in accordance with the law, but Hamden has the right to compete with other businesses by selling different products.

 

ALLEGATIONS OF RACISM

 

“Brothers comes into the neighborhood association meeting and says, ‘If I don’t get a liquor license, I’m going to sell Urban Wear and put in six gas pumps,’” said Elizabeth Thompson, co-owner of Fair Grinds Coffeehouse, which is located just around the corner from Hamden’s property.

 

“It was an ugly threat. I don’t think people would mind if it was presented in a nice way,” Thompson said. “‘I’m gonna bring homeboys into your neighborhood’—it’s such an ugly, racist way to behave.”

 

“The first racist punch was from Brothers, who said, ‘If we don’t get the alcohol license, we’re going to sell Urban Wear and bring young, black men into a predominantly white neighborhood. They appealed to the community’s baser instincts,” said Robert Thompson, also co-owner of Fair Grinds Coffeehouse and Elizabeth’s husband.

 

“I don’t think Urban Wear was part of the original business plan, but was used as a strategy to get the alcohol license,” Robert Thompson said. “I think Urban Wear was used to fan existing fears in an affluent, white community.”

 

“That is absolutely, utterly, completely untrue,” said DiRosa. “We tried to meet with residents. We intended on being a good neighbor. We wanted to hear what they had to say. For someone to have said that there was some racial motivations is totally offensive. That really is way, way out of bounds. The racism exists in the mind of the person who told you that.”

 

Seydel agrees with DiRosa. “All that stuff about racial innuendos is completely untrue and being repeated by people who don’t know what they’re talking about. I absolutely deny that,” he said. “Eddie Hamden has been very cooperative, very patient in letting us work through our process and resolve it.”

 

“Our business is not to make enemies,” said DiRosa. “We want to be friends with our customers.”

Advertisements

New Mid-City restaurant a must-try

June 25, 2008

Jonathan Edwards

Daniel’s offers top-notch cuisine at unbelievable prices

By Jonathan Edwards

Daniel Tobar opened his second restaurant at Tulane and Broad avenues six months before Katrina hit. After the levees broke and 80 percent of New Orleans found itself under water, his sophomore effort took on eight feet of water and killed the whole deal.

Almost three years later, Tobar is back with his newest venture, the five-week-old Daniel’s on the Bayou. Housed in the giant, Death Star apartment complex at the corner of Esplanade Avenue and Moss Street, the prospect of eating at Daniel’s is a little daunting.

The Esplanade at City Park is a gated, all-in-one community protected by a black, moat-like fence surrounding the property. To eat at Daniel’s, drink at the connected Bayou Bar, or patronize the in-house hair salon, someone from the inside must buzz you in.

“It’s a little forbidding. You’re not quite sure if the restaurant and the hair salon are open to people outside the apartment complex,” said Joanna Russo, a resident of Faubourg-St. John when asked why she had yet to patronize any of the businesses inside The Esplanade.

The front-of-house manager, Gretta Mollen, plans to ramp up PR efforts to make the whole thing less mysterious, but has faith in New Orleanians’ desire for amazing food.

“We’ve gotten a huge response from the Mid-City neighborhood….This is New Orleans. If the service is great. If the food is great, you’ll find a way. The gate? Ehhh,” said Mollen with a wave of her hand.

Daniel’s had come highly recommended by Elizabeth Thompson, co-owner of Fair Grinds Coffeehouse, and she gave me a step-by-step how-to on getting to the restaurant. Since I knew the protocol, it was no big deal (I hit a button and someone immediately let me in). In fact, the whole process made me feel like I was an insider, as if I were uttering some unknown password to gain access to an otherwise forbidden 1920s speakeasy. It all felt very…hush hush.

Then I stepped inside, and the whole restaurant screamed, “CHEAP!” Paper table “cloths,” teal/turquoise paint and candle centerpieces that looked like they were just purchased at a garage sale down the street. They even had the filmy sticker leftovers that, once upon a time, probably said something like “50¢.”

Jonathan Edwards

I initially thought the floral arrangements were fake and plastic, but unlike every other part of the décor, the flowers were beautiful and real and added a brilliant color splash to a place that, at first glance, is impressive only in the negative. After high marks from Elizabeth, I was discouraged when I first stepped into Daniel’s.

My disappointment ended as soon as I took my first bite. The “odd” atmosphere, as “fgowner” put it in his post on nola.com’s Mid-City forum, is understandable considering the restaurant has only been open five weeks, but the food is some of the best I’ve had in the city. Mid-City, Uptown, the Marigny, Metairie, even the Westbank—wherever you are, you must make the trek to try this delightful new addition to the New Orleans culinary scene.

I started with the shrimp ceviche at the recommendation of Will, my very attentive, at times overzealous waiter. His recommendations were spot on throughout the night, although one gets the impression that this has less to do with Will and more to do with Daniel executing each dish to with a highly focused creative vision.

The shrimp were fat, plump and juicy, bursting into a full, pleasant mouthfeel with each bite. The perfect blend of red onion, cilantro, tomato and citrus juice left a resonating, pulsing heat on my tongue and in my throat. Long after I had finished, it stayed there like the undying coals in a campfire, a low-grade, humming burn that warmed me all over.

The play between citrus tang and an unidentified sweet element made me pucker one moment before giving me contented relief. Bite after bite, it was a game the ceviche and I played—sweet, sour, sweet, sour—and I was all in. And, unlike the restaurant’s interior, the dish was something to see: white Louisiana shrimp, red tomatoes, green cilantro, all overflowing in a beautiful cascade pouring out of a halved avocado.

Having made a great call with the ceviche, I went with another of Will’s recommendations and one of the evening’s specials—the sautéed catfish—that, how is this even possible, was under $10.

It was served with roasted new potatoes and warm, buttery spinach. The catfish was flaky but not light (two adjectives rarely separated when talking about fish). No, it was not light, but had a solid body that perfectly harmonized with the full mouthfeel of the spinach. The breading on the catfish was light and had an excellent tang that, like the citrus in the ceviche, cut into the fullness of the fish itself.

I am not a fan of roasted potatoes generally; I can never cook them so that they have a decent consistency all the way through. Daniel obviously knows a secret that I do not. They were fabulous—not too starchy, not too hard, but still they maintained some structure (think al dente pasta).

At this point, Will could have recommended the night’s garbage, and I probably would have paid 20 bucks for it, so when he mentioned garlic bread, there was no question. With six pieces for two dollars, it was another steal. With fresh-minced garlic, oregano, rosemary and olive oil—all atop light, crusty bread, it was another tasty pleasure.

Batting three for three, I let Will “surprise” me with dessert. Surprise is in quotation marks, because the menu only sports four options, all of them uninteresting and uninspired in writing. He brought me door number two, the bread budding, crosshatched with chocolate and caramel streaks and swirls. It was very pretty.

It was also piping hot, which always garners huge bonus points with me. Cinnamon, soft raisins, nutmeg—all the usual suspects were there. The bread pudding itself was soggy and mushy, a little less cohesive than I prefer. I like mine to have more structure. Nevertheless, I would still recommend it (although the mango sorbet sounded refreshing). The flavors melded together well, and at no point did I find the bread pudding’s sweetness saccharine.

My only regret is I did not get a red wine with my dessert. I ate the ceviche and catfish with a glass of the Mezzacorona Pinot Grigio, and it’s white-wine bite cut into the full butteriness of the shrimp, catfish and spinach. I had not yet finished the generous pour by the time dessert arrived, and the wine quickly became too harsh and overpowered the dessert.

That’s no fault of Daniel’s. Anytime a restaurant wants to give me a lot of wine that is fine with me. I still should have ordered a glass of a Cabernet Sauvignon, like the Silver Palm North Coast advertised on the menu.

My only major criticism was the huge chasmy rift between the food and the décor. The food was up there with the best in the city. I left smiling at having found this Mid-City gem tucked into The Esplanade at City Park, but it’s definitely a diamond in the rough.

Aside from the fresh-cut, beautiful flowers adorning each table, the decor was something I would expect from a low-class Italian joint ripped out of suburbia America. Outside on the apartment complex’s fence is a Pepsi-Cola sign with generic block letters advertising “DANIEL’S ON THE BAYOU” as if were some taqueria truck catering to lunchtime construction workers. I love a quick, cheap plato as much as anyone, but as soon as you eat anything at Daniel’s, you realize it is so much more.

Jonathan Edwards

Daniel’s features some of the best food I have had in a long time and is easily the best bang for your buck in the entire city—they comped my wine, but my bill was still under $30. Wait. Let me say that again: I had a dynamite four-course dinner for $25.

Daniel’s could easily be the hands-down, date-night choice for strapped guys everywhere (I live a five-minute bike ride away, but even if I still lived Uptown, I would make the fifteen-minute trip at $4 a gallon). But as soon as you walk in, the place is unsettling. The paper tablecloths, the cheap candles, the generally sparse feel—it all made me feel uneasy when juxtaposed with the amazing food in my mouth. Also, noise bleeds freely from Bayou Bar patrons next door and is distracting.

Of course, improvements in décor could mean higher menu prices. Tobar told me some were coming—like replacing the checkered tile floor with hardwood—and as he said it, I regretted all my knee-jerk criticisms. While I love beautiful restaurants, I am a poor foodie, and Daniel’s offers top-notch fare at unbeatable prices. If his new place keeps producing quality cuisine at affordable prices, Daniel’s will quickly capture a hard-core following, myself included.

Let’s just hope another hurricane doesn’t spoil the fun down on the bayou.

Daniel’s on the Bayou

3443 Esplanade Ave. Ste. 155

New Orleans, LA 70119

504.298.1755

Monday – Saturday 11 a.m. – 10 p.m.

Cash and check only. ATM on location ($2.75 fee)


Mid-City uproar over soaring energy bills

June 21, 2008

Entergy customers confused about doubling ‘fuel adjustment charge’

By Jonathan Edwards

Confused Mid-City residents “fell to floor” over the “sticker shock” after receiving the most recent wave of Entergy bills and vowed to take action, according to a multi-thread discussion created earlier this week on the Mid-City Neighborhood Organization’s E-mail group.

“I know that everyone in Orleans Parish is experiencing the same thing, my question is why? I have spoken to people who live in surrounding parishes and they are not getting the HUGE fuel adjustment on their electric bills,” wrote April Allen.

“My fee for actual electric use last month was $141,” Allen continued, “the fuel adjustment was $164, more than my actual electric use. Same with gas!….Between gas, fuel adjustments, car insurance and home owners insurance it’s getting really hard to live here!!”

Natural gas prices have skyrocketed 120 percent in the last year and will lead to higher bills if customers do not take steps to minimize their energy consumption, Entergy announced Thursday on the eve of summer.

Amy Rini has taken a number of steps to conserve energy and reduce her energy bill by weatherizing her house, but the “bills are so high even when our actual fuel and/or gas usage is UNDER $100. The fuel adjustment fees more than double our bill just about every month,” Rini wrote.

Both Allen and Rini mistakenly think that their “energy charge” represents the cost of energy they consumed, and the “fuel adjustment charge” is somehow separate from that said Councilmember Shelley Midura. Many people make this mistake.

People are confused when they say that their fuel adjustment charge is more than what Entergy charged them for the energy they used. The fuel adjustment charge is their energy use, said Midura.

Entergy bills are divided into two main categories: (1) the “energy charge” or base rate, and (2) a fuel adjustment charge, said Morgan Stewart, Entergy New Orleans’s communications manager.

The base rate is the cost of providing and maintaining the infrastructure required to generate, transmit, and distribute energy. These costs include employee salaries, Entergy trucks, power plants, power lines, power poles, Stewart said.

The fuel adjustment charge is based on the cost of raw materials used to generate power—coal and natural gas. Entergy passes these rises and drops in material costs directly to the consumer. Entergy’s profit margin remains the same, said Stewart.

Midura largely agrees with Stewart’s explanation but elaborates on his explanation.

Before Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans in August 2005, Entergy included the cost of nuclear energy generated at their Grand Gulf nuclear station, located in western Mississippi, in the base rate. Grand Gulf’s nuclear-generated electricity is always Entergy’s first power option for New Orleans because it is the least expensive, cheaper than coal and natural gas.

After Katrina, however, a largely emptied New Orleans required little power. With no customers paying money for energy while Entergy still covered their financial costs, the power company suffered massive losses and started selling their nuclear power to other utility companies, Midura said. Cash-strapped Entergy declared Chapter 11 bankruptcy in October 2006, according to the power company’s Web site.

Demand spiked in the hot summer months of 2006 after residents returned to the city, said Midura. In a stopgap effort to provide low-cost nuclear energy to customers, Entergy started including Grand Gulf-generated electricity in the fuel adjustment charge, making it slightly higher than it would be otherwise.

The bills have remained high since Katrina, but for different reason, said Midura. Companies selling energy were wary of doing business with a company in bankruptcy, so the ones that did charged high prices.

“Nobody would do business with Entergy. The ones that did charged them an arm and a leg, so they passed that along to the consumer,” said Councilmember Midura.

Entergy stabilized as energy-using, bill-paying customers returned to the city, and the New Orleans power company exited bankruptcy in May 2007, according to an Entergy newsletter. Re-establishing themselves allowed the power company to buy energy at a cheaper rate, said Midura.

Record-high energy costs—like the 120 percent increase in natural gas prices over the last year—have kept bills high for New Orleans customers.

“The most effective way, however, that customers can manage their electricity bills is to manage their electricity usage,” said Melonie Hall, customer service director for Entergy New Orleans.

Entergy’s Thursday press release “encourages wiser energy use this summer,” including raising the temperature on your air-conditioner, turning off electronic equipment when you are not using it, and weatherizing leaky doors and windows.


Mid-City Crime Drops

June 18, 2008

By Jonathan Edwards

Mid-City street crime dropped significantly between the months of April and May, said New Orleans Police Department Captain Robert Norton, the acting commander for the First District, which includes Mid-City and Faubourg-St. John.

Crimes committed against individuals, including murder and robbery, are down 46 percent, while property crimes, such as burglary and auto theft, are also down 11 percent, Norton told Mid-City residents and police officers gathered for the June meeting of the New Orleans Neighborhood Police Anti-Crime Council.

Leading the way, burglaries committed against individual residences plummeted by more than half, from 31 incidents in April to just 15 in May.

The only category of crime that rose significantly between the two months was auto theft, which increased by more than 30 percent. There were 35 auto thefts reported in April. That number spiked to 46 in May.

First district police officers baited undercover cars in a two-day sting and made nine arrests during the operation. Three people were arrested at the intersection of Bayou Road and North Johnson Street, according to a June 15 department E-mail.


Fire destroys Mid-City drug house

June 14, 2008

By Jonathan Edwards

A two-alarm fire ripped through a vacant Mid-City drug house Saturday morning and burned it to the ground.

“I was there, seeing all the smoke get darker and darker, and then the flames shot out,” Joseph said, who lives across the street but declined to give his last name. “Electrical wires was popping and s*** under that. It was a hell of a fire. I don’t know what caused it, but I know it was a big-ass damn fire.”


Joseph Brock

It took 50 firefighters 2 1/2 hours to control the blaze at the two-story building at the corner of Banks and South Gayoso streets. No other structures were damaged.

The vacant building was a well-known hub of drug activity, said community activist Jospeh Brock.

“Thank the lord!” Brock wrote in an e-mail to members of the Mid-City Neighborhood Organization in the hours after the fire. “The drug white house on the corner on Banks Street & S. Gayoso is burning down!…with this house gone it will help with the bring down the drug traffic.”

No one was injured, and the cause of the fire remains under investigation.


Award-winning project aims to create citizen-responsive government

June 13, 2008

Neighborhood Associations’ disregard of renters a roadblock to full citizen involvement, says project director

By Jonathan Edwards

The New Orleans Citizen Participation Project met today to jumpstart a grassroots efforts that would take decision-making power out of the backrooms at City Hall and put it in the hands of residents.

We have to have an open chain of information between government and citizens, said Khalil Shahyd, the director of the New Orleans CPP, when he gave an hour-long presentation to community leaders and activists from across the city.

Right now the decisions are already made, the contracts are already signed, things are already done before citizens have any chance for involvement, Shahyd said.

A formal citizen participation project “allows residents to be aware of the activities of government before they occur,” according to a pamphlet distributed during the meeting at the Beacon of Hope Resource Center in Lakeview. “It requires that neighborhood residents be enabled to take part in the planning process and monitor progress on public or private projects and programs.

“Instead of having people overflowing City Council chambers in distress about proposed development, residents will be made aware of all plans and be allowed to give input on those decisions that directly affect their community,” the pamphlet continues.

“It makes sure that what happens is what people want” Shahyd said. An issue arises or a proposal is presented—residents hear about it and decide if it is in their best interest.

The idea is not new, nor is it unique to New Orleans, said Shahyd. The PowerPoint presentation moved on, revealing a map of the United States. Stars started popping up on the screen, representing already-existing citizen participation programs: Sacramento, Houston, New York City, Baltimore—at least a dozen lit up.

Some of these programs have been around since the 1970s, but most were created in a “top-down decision” by a city’s government, Shahyd said. Local officials decided that their citizens needed this tool, and so they gave it to them. New Orleans will be the first “ground-up” approach, emerging from a collection of neighborhood groups.

“Our citizen participation program will be created by you. It is a people-driven exercise, and everyone is invited,” said Shahyd. “We hope that in six months to a year that we can create the first bottom-up, citizen-led democracy in America. It sounds like a lot, but we can do it.”

In the CPP model used in other cities, neighborhood associations are the grassroots forums where residents voice concerns over issues or make a decision passed down from city government, said Shahyd. He then attacked some New Orleans neighborhood organizations, though none by name, for excluding certain groups in their respective communities.

“We’re seeing a return to a land-based type of participation,” Shahyd said, referring to a time in early U.S. history when the right to vote required property ownership. “They’re not really operating as a neighborhood association, but as a homeowners association,” he said. The interests of renters are often ignored, said Shahyd.

Tension between homeowners and renters is not a new subject for Shahyd. He addressed them in an August 2006 interview as many New Orleanians were returning to the city after a Katrina-induced exile. On camera, an emotional Shahyd mentions an unnamed contingent of New Orleans residents who did not want renters, or rental properties, back in the city:

“We have to understand: whether you’re a homeowner or you’re a renter, it’s not because people own land, or because they own property that they want to come back,” he said. “But it’s because this land owns us; we belong to this land.

“And so young or old, crippled, blind, dumb and crazy, people want to come back to here, because this land is concrete, the soil, the river, the lake—everything—it owns us, and we belong to it. It has nothing to do with homeowners and renters,” said Shahyd.

Shahyd and the New Orleans CPP aim to use neighborhood associations, including the homeowners they represent, as the primary conduits of information between city government and individual residents. Open communication, Shahyd said, is the key to citizen-led decision-making.

“If citizens don’t have the relevant information, they can’t make decisions that affect their lives and their neighborhoods,” said Shahyd. A citizen participation project in New Orleans would increase government transparency and accountability, and would do so by creating a system where there is an open flow of information between elected officials and the citizens they represent.

Mike Murphy, the community outreach director for Tulane University’s Environmental Law Clinic, asked Shahyd how the project would acquire operational funding.

Many already-existing citizen participation projects are funded by their city’s annual budget, Shahyd responded. This, however, leaves them open to fluctuations in the political climate. Nevertheless, a similar project in New Orleans would probably acquire funding from the city budget, but Shahyd also said private funding was possible as well.

The New Orleans CPP is in the middle of a two-month campaign to inform city residents about their project and galvanize energy for their upcoming July summit after winning a $25,000 grant from the Seattle-based Case Foundation, according to a May 9 press release. Resident input at the summit, Shahyd says, will determine many key features of New Orleans citizen participation project will look like.

“The Summit will provide additional information on the concept of a formal Citizen Participation Program; more important, citizen attendees will begin the work of designing the CPP process going forward and determining how they wish to guide the project through the design and implementation phases.”

Neither Kate Parker, the president of the Faubourg-St. John Neighborhood Association, nor Jennifer Weishaupt, the president of the Mid-City Neighborhood Organization, could be reached by deadline. Lifeblood Beat will continue tracking this story.


A journalist’s manifesto

June 11, 2008

By Jonathan Edwards

 

Scarcely a year ago, I stood arms akimbo, a newly minted bachelor’s degree in hand, confidently gazing across the panoramic horizon of infinite post-college possibilities.

 

I was going to grab the world by the horns, wrestle her to the ground like a rodeo cowboy and give her a big ol’ noogie until she squealed, “Olly olly oxen free!” and gave me what I wanted. The problem: I didn’t know what that was.

 

She ruthlessly jumped on my hesitation and indecision, got out of her prone position and punched me square in the face.

 

Like many cohorts of Generation Y, college graduation and the myriad career opportunities that would seemingly define who I would be forever and ever—this situation sent me into a paralyzing downward spiral of inaction where I languished for months.

 

I tried to lock myself away and hide from a world that kept pounding at my door, shouting, “This is your quarter-life crisis! Open up and tell us what you want to be immediately! You are a grown up!” 

 

A plumber, a cook, a retail salesman, a bartender, a six-month volunteer in post-Katrina New Orleans—I recently thought it would be fun to be either a taxi cab driver or a bike messenger—I have made a valiant effort to evade the Career Police. But they keep knocking, undeterred.

 

Like many baby boomers parenting their coming-of-age, Gen-Y youngsters, mine have been tirelessly supportive, and even my Greatest-Generation grandmother cannot be mussed into a cut-your-hair-and-get-a-real-job admonishment:

 

“You spent $60,000 of my money to graduate from UC Berkeley, and now you want to tend bar in New Orleans?” would have been a justified question coming from her.

 

<BEAT>

 

“That sounds great. I am so proud of you. I wish I had explored more when I was your age,” is what she actually said when we touched on the subject months ago over the telephone. It wasn’t a backhanded compliment either. She meant it.

 

Grandma’s understanding aside, the time for indecision and inaction is over. This article is not only my answer to the Career Police—“I am a journalist.  I am a writer”—but a statement of how I will use this blog, and where I think journalism should aim as a profession.

 

In his March 2008 New Yorker article “Out of Print”, Eric Alterman foresees the inexorable demise of the printed newspaper:

 

“[T]rends in circulation and advertising––the rise of the Internet, which has made the daily newspaper look slow and unresponsive; the advent of Craigslist, which is wiping out classified advertising––have created a palpable sense of doom. Independent, publicly traded American newspapers have lost forty-two per cent of their market value in the past three years, according to the media entrepreneur Alan Mutter.”

 

After deciding this dying industry was the place for me, I wrote a cover letter, brushed the rust off my resume and collected story samples from my days as a student journalist.  I sent it all to 25 newspapers in Louisiana and New England. 

 

My three-month effort to break into the business proved Alterman’s article right.  Readers, more and more, are going online for their news. This means less money for newspapers, which has resulted in layoffs across the country. 

 

With veteran journalists seasoned by five to ten years experience gunning for the few entry-level positions available, I have not had the chance of brushing up on my interviewing skills, to put it politely.

 

So I am online with Lifeblood Beat to report the pulse of Mid-City and New Orleans, the neighborhood and city in which I live. I am determined to take advantage of Alterman’s doomsday thesis instead of being crushed under the forces it describes.

 

While the tide is shifting on the subject, most American newspapers still insist that there is an Objective Truth—capital O, capital T—and that reporters function as the unbiased conduits of this Truth from an event to the page. 

 

I make no such claim. Lifeblood Beat is to be a space for professional-quality journalism firmly rooted in issues and interests relevant to my community: Mid-City first, New Orleans second.

 

I will research and interview and write articles. But I do not want people experiencing this blog to read its content as passive storages of idle information.  React, engage, debate, dialogue—I want Lifeblood Beat to be an active part of an active community.

 

Say I got it right. Say I completely missed an entire perspective relevant to an issue. Say that selling liquor at the Brother’s Food Mart will/will not adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood because x, y, and z. Say something. 

 

I know I will.